On Liberty
By liberty I mean
the assurance that every man shall be protected in doing what he be-lieves
his duty against the influence of authority and majorities. The State
is competent to as-sign duties and draw the line between good and evil
only in its immediate sphere. . . . In ancient times the State absorbed
authorities not it own, and intruded on the domain of personal free-dom.
In the Middle Ages it possessed too little authority, and suffered
others to intrude. Modern States fall habitually into both exces-ses.
The most certain test by which we judge whether a country is really free
is the amount of security enjoyed by minorities. Liberty, by this
definition, is the essential condition and guar-dian of religion; and it
is in the history of the Chosen People, accordingly, that the first
illus-trations of my subject are obtained. The go-vernment of the
Israelites was a Federation, held together by no political authority,
but by the unity of race and faith, and founded, not on physical force,
but on a voluntary covenant. (278)
On Power
Suspect power
more than vice. (414)
Power tends to
corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost
al-ways bad men, even when they exercise influ-ence and not authority:
still more when you su-peradd the tendency or the certainty of
corrup-tion by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office
sanctifies the holder of it. (300)
You would hang a
man of no position, like Ravaillac; but if what one hears is true, then
Eli-zabeth asked the gaoler to murder Mary, and William III ordered his
Scots minister to extir-pate a clan. Here are the greatest names
coup-led with the greatest crimes. You would spare these criminals, for
some mysterious reason. I would hang them higher than Haman, for rea-sons
of quite obvious justice; still more, still higher, for the sake of
historical science. (300)
And my dogma is not
the special wickedness of my own spiritual Superiors, but the general
wickedness of men in authority, of Luther and Zwingli and Calvin and
Cranmer and Knox, of Mary Stuart and Henry VIII, of Philip II and Eli-zabeth,
or Cromwell and Louis XIV, James and Clarles and Willam, Bossuet . . .
(301)
On History
History is an
iconoclast, not a school of re-verence. (400)
History has done
much to encourage the de-light in war. The motive has been to make men
willing to fight, and to dissimulate the dis-courage facts: the night
after the battle, the scenes in the hospital, the horrible wounds, the
ruined homes, the devastation, the suffering and misery, the terrors of
sudden death, all kept out of sight, the horrors of captured towns.
(399)
History had
depended on theology, juris-prudence, philology. [It] has outgrown
them. No further troubles of that kind [but it is] still in-terfered
with by politics. . . . The history of ideas undermines national
treatment—ideas
are not national, like laws and customs. (400)
All understanding
of history depends on one's understanding of the forces that make it, of
which religious forces are most active, and the most definite. We can't
follow all the varia-tions of a human mind, but when we know the
religious motive . . . we have the master key." (285)
On Historians
By an honest
historian we mean one who pleads no cause, who keeps no shelter for a
friend, no pillory for a foe—who
does the same justice to that which he loathes as to that which he
loves. (400)
No priest,
accustomed to the Confessional, and a fortiori no historian, thinks well
of human nature." (416)
On the Retroactive
Application of Infallibility
The Bulls which
imposed a belief in the de-posing power [of Popes], the Bulls which
pre-scribed the tortures and kindled the flames of the Inquisition, the
Bulls which erected witch-craft into a system and made the extermination
of witches a frightful reality, would become as venerable as the decrees
of Nicaea, as incontro-vertible as the writings of S. Luke. . . . And
the sentences of every Protestant judge (by the Bull Cum ex
Apostolatus Officio) would be in-valid. (197)
To me they [Ultramontanists]
are in religion what Jacobins and Communards are in politics. (323)
On the Purpose of the
Best Books
[T]o open windows
in every direction, to raise him to the level of his age, so that he may
know the (twenty or thirty) forces that have made our world what it is,
and still reign over it; to guard him against surprises, and against the
constant sources of error within; to supply him both with the strongest
stimulants and the surest guides; to give force and fulness and
clearness and sincerity to his mind, that he may know the method and law
of the process by which error is conquered and truth is won: dis-cerning
knowledge from probability and pre-judice from belief; that he may learn
to master what he rejects as fully as what he adopts; that he may
understand the origin as well as the strength and vitality of systems
and the better motives of men who are wrong; to steel him against the
charm of literary beauty and talent, so that each book, thoroughly taken
in, shall be the beginning of a new life and shall make a new man of
him. (286)
Acton Page