Review
of
Christopher Dawson, The Dynamics of World History, John J. Mulloy
ed.
New York: Sheed and Ward 1956. From The American Historical
Review, 63:1, October 1957, 77-79.
Christopher Dawson
is, perhaps, the most thoughtful, stimulating, and suggestive historian
of the Catholic faith who in this century has devoted himself to the
general history of civilization. He is more down to earth and
convincing than
[Oswald] Spengler or
[Arnold J.] Toynbee. He
is also more modest, for he tells us that “the history of a single
civilization seems to be the most that we can hope to achieve.” Those
historians who have known of Dawson only through his brilliant volume on The Making of Europe will
be surprised, whether pleasantly or not, when they read the book under
review. It reveals Dawson as a writer so well versed in anthropology,
sociology, psychology, and the basic ideas which have dominated
historical perspectives over the ages that he almost measures up to the
pattern of the ideal historian recommended by
James Harvey Robinson in
his The New History.
The Dynamics of World History
is an anthology—not an abridgement—of Dawson's writings on the history
of civilization, selected by a learned and discriminating admirer, John
J. Mulloy, who adds a supplement of more than fifty pages summarizing
and interpreting
Dawson's ideas. Mulloy seems determined that no reader miss, distort, or
undervalue any of
Dawson's
achievements or convictions. The volume contains more articles,
lectures, and essays than excerpts from his chief books, although there
are some of the latter. It therefore not only gives a new and less
well-known impression of Dawson as a historian but also presents
material which will be fresh to all save those who have been close
followers of his writings in the past.
In his approach to
the history of civilization,
Dawson
adopts what he calls a sociological frame of reference. The fields and
issues which most concern him are the relations between primitive and
so-called historic cultures, the contact of cultures and the resulting
cross-fertilization, the dynamic or causative factors in the development
of human culture, the main theories of cultural evolution and world
history presented during the Christian era, and comparative religion,
with special emphasis on the influence of religion on the course of
human development and its interpretations.
The book has two main
parts: a broad sociological approach to the chief factors, stages, and
problems in the history of civilization, stressing the importance of
urban civilization in our day, which reflects the influence of
Patrick Geddes and Victor
Branford; and a discussion of the great conceptions or panoramas of
world history set forth from Augustine's City of God to Toynbee's
A Study of History. Dawson's
appraisal of these interpretations of the nature and meaning of world
history is astute, judicious, and informing. He attributes emergence of
the conception of world history, with an impressive future lying ahead,
to the influence of Judaism and Christianity, which, he claims, really
launched the sociological approach to history. The philosophical
interpretation of history by the classical thinkers and historians
produced a provincial and restricted outlook on human development and a
belief in recurring cycles rather than a dynamic conception of progress.
Perfectionists will
find some things to complain about. They may hold that, although Dawson
assumes to adopt a sociological interpretation of history, theology
takes over in the ultimate showdown; that his conception of sociology is
rather archaic and also highly selective, in that he chooses particular
sociologists and even those views which clash the least with Catholic
dogma; and that, although he criticizes the philosophical approach to
history, he really approves it in his theory of “metahistory.”
Nevertheless, not even the most militant Protestant or skeptical
historian, if he is fair and honest, can read this book without being
impressed by Dawson’s learning, comprehension, and perspective or
stimulated by his remarkable ability to go to the heart of an issue, to
state his points and conclusions with great cogency and brilliant
precision. Those who differ with him about basic ideology will profit
by seeking to observe or emulate the same degree of mellowness,
urbanity, and tolerance which permeates
Dawson's
writings.
In the concluding
chapter, Dawson makes clear that the long era during which Europe has
dominated the course of human civilization has now come to an end, and
he draws some sagacious conclusions as to the import of this for the
human future. This is a book which no thoughtful historian can safely
ignore, and it is as timely as it is illuminating.
Malibu,
California
Posted February
17, 2008