From Barnes’ introduction to Dr. William J. Robinson, If I
Were God: a Freethinker’s Faith. Incorporating a Discussion between the
Author and a Catholic Priest, New York, The Freethought Press
Association, 1930, 11-17. Those who admire Barnes for his pioneering
historical revisionism should apply the historical method to
understanding this historian, and not overlook his
anti-supernaturalism.
Introduction to If
I Were God
Harry
Elmer Barnes
Dr. William J. Robinson
is well known as one of the world’s leading writers on the problems of
sexology. Those familiar with his writings recognize that he is also a
progressive reformer in many other phases of human interests and
activities. He has consistently supported economic and social
liberalism. He was one of the few pacifists who remained true to his
convictions in wartime.
Not the least of his
interests is the promulgation of general intellectual enlightenment.
His exuberant praise of H. G. Wells’ “World of William Clissold,”
indicated clearly his reaction in this field as illustrated by his
appraisal of perhaps the foremost monument to intellectual emancipation
in modern literature. It is his enthusiasm for cultural progress and
mental freedom which has prompted Dr. Robinson to prepare this
stimulating little book on the problem of religion in the modern world.
Orthodox religion is
coming in for some weighty assaults at the present time from
anthropologists, psychologists and historians. The results of this
varied critique are being brought together by the Humanists in the most
serious challenge which has ever been leveled against the conventional
religionist. How little headway can be made against Humanism was well
illustrated by the article of Dr. Harry Emerson Fosdick in Harper’s
Magazine for December, 1929.
Most of these attacks
upon orthodoxy have, however, been of a technical character or have been
written in extensive and esoteric treatises which make little headway
with the public in general. There is need for a clear and brief
discussion of leading issues which will appeal directly to a large group
of readers. It is to fill this need that Dr. Robinson has given us his
“A Freethinker’s Faith.”
Dr. Robinson is well
prepared to execute this task. He has read widely in the literature of
religion. He has, in the course of his career, come into contact many
times and in the most divers ways with the evil effects of religion. No
man is more likely to be wounded by the devotees of orthodoxy than the
enlightened sexologist and the sincere pacifist. Dr. Robinson’s career
bears the scars of many felonious assaults by the fanatical exponents of
private virtue and public slaughter. Yet he has been able to retain a
remarkable objectivity in the face of such experiences. His appraisal
of the evil effects of religion is far less severe and sweeping than the
views of the present writer on this subject. Finally, Dr. Robinson
writes in a juicy popular style which should recommend his book to the
average reader who abhors dry abstractions.
Dr. Robinson states his
purpose very clearly in the following words:
Because religion stands
in the way of human progress, because it does not permit men to think
boldly and logically, because it gives a reactionary priesthood not only
spiritual but also material power over the people, because it is
necessary that man shall learn to stand on his own feet not expecting
salvation from the outside, because, finally, there is no hope of
otherwise establishing universal friendship and brotherhood, it is
necessary to eliminate dogmatic religion. This book was written to aid
in bringing about this elimination.
Dr. Robinson wisely
limits himself to a discussion of the cardinal points in supernatural
orthodoxy, thus enabling him to deliver heavy and concentrated blows
against the main defenses of conventional religion. Taking up the
question of what we shall put in the place of the old time religion, he
shows that there are many things in society like a headache which do not
have to be replaced by another ache. There can be no substitute for
religious superstition except sound knowledge and logical thinking.
Linked with this subject is the problem of what we shall give the
masses as the basis for social control and collective hope. Dr.
Robinson makes it clear that it is high time that we ceased to give them
the opium of religion and began to feed them the saving realities of
secular knowledge. He is wise enough to see through the prevalent
illusion that we must preserve orthodoxy indefinitely as the mob
policeman.
Equally effectively does
he puncture the notion that only a religious man can be a decent moral
citizen. He shows that much which the religious fanatic regards as
moral is cruel, savage and, fundamentally, highly immoral. Likewise he
makes it clear that some of the world’s most useful citizens have been
freethinkers, and many of them avowed atheists, while most criminals are
religious. Finally, he makes it plain that a sound morality must be
constructed on secular foundations rather than upon the basis of the
superstitions of supernatural religion.
Dealing with the problem
of God, the complex and intricate cosmos and the question of creation
Dr. Robinson demonstrates that the more we learn about the nature of the
physical universe the more difficult and insoluble becomes the problem
of its origin and direction. We cannot fathom the mysteries of nature;
therefore we are not likely to discover what is back of these mysteries.
Perhaps the most
striking sections in the book are those dealing with the problem of
“Providence” and the reconciliation of the notion of a good God and an
evil world.
Dr. Robinson launches a
devastating attack upon the conventional theory of Providence which
holds that a beneficent Providence may hurl a hundred to death in a
train wreck and save the single individual who has a hunch to cancel his
trip. Of a kind is the theory that ill-luck makes us sick while
Providence saves our life and restores us to health. Dr. Robinson
demonstrates for all time that the conventional Christian doctrine of
Providential interference in human affairs one of the most arrogant,
brutal, selfish and illogical illusions which has ever cursed the human
race.
In his chapter on God
and human affairs Dr. Robinson gives us an extensive and sane summary of
the type of action which would reasonably be expected of a civilized and
kindly deity, viewed from the human standpoint. And in succeeding
chapters on atheism, agnosticism, pantheism and related subjects he
shows convincingly enough the essential folly of any attempt to
construct judgments of God from the human point of view. Yet it is
extremely illuminating to contrast the course of human events, as they
have actually taken place, and the facts of organic with the least which
might have been expected of a God who controlled human affairs with the
slightest pretense to the traits of a gentleman and a scholar.
Dr. Robinson gives us a
sane analysis of the “Jesus stereotype.” He admits the probable good
intentions of Jesus and his possible devotion to what he believed was
right. Yet he shows fully the limitations of Jesus’ knowledge,
experience and outlook and exposes the utter folly of looking backward
to Jesus as the peerless teacher of all time and the guide to social
progress to-day. He has the courage to point out the liability of the
Christian Church to civilization through the ages, but he is fair enough
to acquit Jesus of all blame for an institution he had no intention of
founding and which was so utterly foreign to the views attributed to
Jesus in the gospel story.
We may heartily commend
the volume to American readers as a concise assessment of religion in
modern life. Its wide circulation should do much to dispel bigotry and
intolerance. If it sweeps away orthodoxy in a relentless fashion, it
prepares the way at the same time for any sensible humanistic cult based
on scientific knowledge and secular ambitions.
Posted April 26, 2008